Party Invitations Budweiser

launched a petition for full freedom of expression in France
Site Survey and Debate comes to starting a petition for full freedom of expression in France. (Text).

The petition begins by noting that "A force of increasingly stringent laws, France has limited the freedom of expression to the point that it became impossible to speak freely in our country." She denounced the trial in the XVII criminal division for a yes to no, the climate of intellectual terrorism that prevails, the hot pursuit of perfectly respectable people and organizations thought police:

"associations do representing that they, subsidized by the state, have illegitimately a moral power and judicial considerable power and are a daily nuisance. "

What the petition request is a total freedom of expression is to "return to full freedom of expression that occurred in France between the summer of 1789 and summer 1792 (and still know that the United States through the first amendment passed in 1791).

Is this excessive? Maybe in theory, but on freedom of expression, the seller gives the finger arm. We take the example of incitement to racial hatred. Of course, if it were to condemn the real belching hatred and incitement to violence, everyone would agree. But everyone can see that this is not what it is that the concept of racial hatred is extended indefinitely to cover up criticism of religions (the most protected in all cases) and more it is applied in a double standard Overall, the anti-French hatred are giving free reign freely.

The petition calls for a return to common sense and the debate:

"Justice is not done to address the issues of expression, but to deal with robberies, rapes, crimes and misdemeanors under physical or penal. Anything related to the expression is both sacred and superior to the opinion of anyone who might be tempted to ban it.

The expression is always preferable to censorship because it allows idiots and to potential criminals to uncover their own, rather than hiding behind screens of virtues that make them more difficult to identify. Before the war, because some incited the population to read Mein Kampf to understand who Hitler was and what he wanted. "

It calls for the abolition of all laws restricting freedom without exception

" Freedom of fullest expression is the sine qua non for scientific research, openness, independence of mind, and thus the civilization of ours. By signing this petition, each party expresses its desire to repeal all laws that have limited in some way or another, freedom of expression since 1792, including the laws of 1881 (on freedom of the press while the limit), 1972 (Act Pleven), 1990 (Act Gayssot), 2003 (Act Lellouche), 2004 (ordering the Halde) and all memory laws. "

It is part of an international context. The Austrian Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolf, convicted of blasphemy against Muhammad, asked the same thing (source). In Holland, Wilders claims it as well.

This petition is all the more necessary that freedom of expression on the Internet is threatened by the law known LOPPSI 2, just adopted, requires "persons whose activity is to provide access to communication services to the public in line" to "contribute to the fight against the spread" of content being "an apologist for crimes against humanity, incitement to racial hatred and child pornography. " Without a court order (source). Ampliation of the law known HADOPI LOPPSI 2 is among the Gentiles all full texts which are intended to protect children against pedophiles. As expected, it extends far beyond its censorship of pornography sites.


http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/citoyennete/article/lancement-d-une-petition-pour-la-89560