France24 - French foreign minister quits after miserable term in office
French foreign minister quits after miserable term in office
No Flash warning
To take advantage of all the features on FRANCE24.COM, please click here to download the latest version of Flash Player.
France's Foreign Minister Michèle Alliot-Marie has tendered her resignation in a letter to President Nicolas Sarkozy, following a series of gaffes related to the recent uprising in Tunisia.
By News Wires (text)
AP - The office of France’s foreign minister says she has sent a letter to President Nicolas Sarkozy offering her resignation.
Syndicate contentFrench diplomatic blunders
*
French diplomacy's ghastly new year
FRANCE
French diplomacy's ghastly new year
*
Tunisia scandal: Can french foreign minister hang on?
TALKING POINTS
Tunisia scandal: Can french foreign minister hang on?
*
French PM joins minister aboard 'Air Dictator' scandal
FRANCE
French PM joins minister aboard 'Air Dictator' scandal
*
Official travel must be 'compatible' with foreign policy, Sarkozy says
FRANCE
Official travel must be 'compatible' with foreign policy, Sarkozy says
*
New French envoy in Tunis apologises for media faux pas
DIPLOMACY
New French envoy in Tunis apologises for media faux pas
Michele Alliot-Marie has been at the center of a political storm over her December vacation in Tunisia as popular protests there eventually led to the ouster of the former French colony’s longtime strongman.
The letter sent Sunday comes as Sarkozy was preparing a prime-time address to the nation as speculation swirled that a new Cabinet shake-up was in the offing - notably with Alliot-Marie said to be in the ejector seat.
A spokesman for Sarkozy’s office declined immediate comment about whether the president had accepted the resignation.
Click here to find out more!
*
French PM joins minister aboard 'Air Dictator' scandal
FRANCE
French PM joins minister aboard Air Dictator 'scandal
*
French diplomacy's ghastly new year
FRANCE French diplomacy's ghastly new year
http://www.france24.com/en/20110227-France-foreign-minister-tenders-resignation- Tunisia-Michele Alliot-Marie
The Marvel Universe In All Directions!
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Pokemon Silver Cheat List Vba
Iraq message to the world, Iraqis are coming ... # · Global Voices
This post is also available in: Français
· Iraq: To the Entire WORLD, # IRAQI are coming ...
* reddit * StumbleUpon
* delicious *
Instapaper
Print Print
... thus saith @ ArabPeople
The Iraqi people are taking inspiration from the various revolutions which agitate the Arab world has given the departure of his own day of anger on February 25. The main event was located on Tahrir Square in Baghdad but other similar events were held throughout the country. @ ArabPeople writing [the links are in English]: #
Iraq has just begun and it will surprise the # entire Arab world. No other revolution has begun in 17 + different locations. This is just the beginning.
Facebook page of the Iraqi revolution has published a list of claims brought here in their entirety, which ends with:
FROM TODAY WE DO MORE THAN PROMISES
- We are tired of politicians statements, honeyed promises tired, tired of making prosthetic that some officials are taking to pull the wool over the eyes of people.
- empty promises will not ease the anger, poor ad does not wrap the ill-dressed and brilliant slogans n'étancheront not the thirst of those to whom they are intended.
- Silence is no longer a choice for each of us, starting today we are no longer silent ...
- So how long will they stay the Iraqis still divided into two classes , one who eats meat, and one that eats the fat!
- And how long a group of people going to touch it yet more figures, each wage satisfying a whole clan, while others do not even have a penny to support the welfare of their own!
- And how long a group will he heat of the fire caused by the burning of public funds while others die because of cold winter nights!
- And how much longer will enjoy some fresh water in the heat of summer while others may quench their thirst with water sewers!
GOD IS IN WITNESS ... WE DO NOT REMAIN SILENT PLUS
IQ4C has posted the plan of the demonstration in Baghdad in this image:
CA55FA96-2E51-417E-A627-FC28F1779999.jpg
and then relayed on twitter:
tired of trying to eat today was a good training to express my freedom in peace, I am a peaceful man, besides being a civilian iraq # # # feb25 iq4c
Sunshine provides coverage of Mosul, where his cousin was involved in the event. She relays some stunning images and named the event:
Today is "Friday of Wrath" and this revolution is called: Al Nakheel's revolution "revolution of the palms."
she writes
The important thing is that for people not to break everything ...
Another thing that is nice to see is people doing all the "Friday prayers "Al Tahreer in Baghdad, Sunnis and Shiites together, and they launched" We are Sunni and Shiite brothers and we do not sell out this country, "the same thing is going to Sulaymania when Kurds and Arabs prayed together ... citizens are united, the government is trying to separate us and extend the confessional, but it will not happen, and plans, as sneaky as they are, will not succeed ..
I pray for a hopeful future, and today I am proud of the Iraqis I know how people are great here, and how they endured, not only for 7 years, but since Saddam took control of the country ...
Warnings in power
The Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, accusing supporters of Saddam and al-Qaida have organized demonstrations and Shiite religious leaders have urged people not to not manifest. Healing Iraq gives (here and here), the bridge of view:
intimidation tactics Maliki no longer work with the Iraqis and only serve to discredit a little more. Iraqis are tired of cronyism, corruption ...
Typical reaction from the clerical establishment that wants to maintain its grip on the Iraqi Shia in order to keep its coffers full. These anti-corruption protests that swept the country in Sulaimaniya Barash are a huge threat to those who hamper progress in the 'democratic Iraq'.
Hawazin Abbas added:
Conduct adopted [by the Iraqi government] in the approach to these events was EXACTLY the same as all tyrannies around: confirmation anxious to deep uncertainty about his own legitimacy, the race promises to train delays, questioning the merits of the dispute and the attempts to appeal to the old bogeymen ... Now, I am FIRMLY against this government
Kassakhoon think these events are just the beginning:
Protests also show how this government is weak and terrified by the population when it sends security forces by the thousands to block roads, mainly bridge leading to the already heavily fortified Green Zone protected by high concrete walls, anti-explosion.
No government officials dared to appear before the demonstrators, they only spoke to state television ..
It is true that the events of today are over the field, but they are still alive inside the demonstrators. What we witnessed today was a little snowball that just started to roll and that will grow every day.
Unlike Mr. Maliki, who accused the protesters of being in the pay of Saddam, Layla Anwar path, among the Iraqi bloggers, is the closest a Saddamism gives a rather different view on events:
PROTESTS 'my ass. Where were you when the tanks arrived? Where were you when the Shiite sectarian and turbaned mullahs you have purchased a few hundred dollars for a finger dipped in purple ink and vote "Democratic" ...
Where were you when we have fled en masse, living the lives of dogs in exile ... Where were you when you wore the militias have emerged naked and danced for you and that we have all been decimated? Where were you, anyway?
Where were you when you left another son of a bitch sectarian Iran again take power, for a second term and you sat with them and talked about national reconciliation and urns?!
Where were you when the Iraqi resistance fighting against the invader ALONE?
... ...
demand better living conditions for the puppets is a nonsense. Hundreds of foreign companies live on your back, bringing with them their own staff by giving yourself to your fate, the so-called educated class of work, blue collar workers in your own country ...
So, where were Do you? ... ...
Drop me a bit, you hypocrites.
Iraq is my greatest love and you are my biggest disappointment.
Speak as much as you want, I do not lend my voice. I was a lone voice for the last 5 years and have suffered the worst abuse in your name. Protest all you want.
Creative Commons License Written by Salam Adil
· Translated by Jean Saint-Dizier
Translation published February 27, 2011 · Printer Print
redditreddit
* * * StumbleUponStumbleUpon
deliciousdelicious
* InstapaperInstapaper
Other tickets on Iraq
*
Read
Iraqis clamoring for change
*
Read
Iraq: A hello to the people of Egypt *
Arab World: Lamentations on the failure of Sudan
read more »
Delete this comment
Comment Please ... Login »
Name (Required) Contact
(will not be published on the site) (Required) Website
Receive e-mail future comments on this post
Rules Comment moderation
* All comments are moderated. Do not send more than once your comment. It could be mistaken for spam by our anti-virus.
* Treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks against individuals will not be approved.
http://fr.globalvoicesonline.org/2011/02/27/59135/
This post is also available in: Français
· Iraq: To the Entire WORLD, # IRAQI are coming ...
* reddit * StumbleUpon
* delicious *
Instapaper
Print Print
... thus saith @ ArabPeople
The Iraqi people are taking inspiration from the various revolutions which agitate the Arab world has given the departure of his own day of anger on February 25. The main event was located on Tahrir Square in Baghdad but other similar events were held throughout the country. @ ArabPeople writing [the links are in English]: #
Iraq has just begun and it will surprise the # entire Arab world. No other revolution has begun in 17 + different locations. This is just the beginning.
Facebook page of the Iraqi revolution has published a list of claims brought here in their entirety, which ends with:
FROM TODAY WE DO MORE THAN PROMISES
- We are tired of politicians statements, honeyed promises tired, tired of making prosthetic that some officials are taking to pull the wool over the eyes of people.
- empty promises will not ease the anger, poor ad does not wrap the ill-dressed and brilliant slogans n'étancheront not the thirst of those to whom they are intended.
- Silence is no longer a choice for each of us, starting today we are no longer silent ...
- So how long will they stay the Iraqis still divided into two classes , one who eats meat, and one that eats the fat!
- And how long a group of people going to touch it yet more figures, each wage satisfying a whole clan, while others do not even have a penny to support the welfare of their own!
- And how long a group will he heat of the fire caused by the burning of public funds while others die because of cold winter nights!
- And how much longer will enjoy some fresh water in the heat of summer while others may quench their thirst with water sewers!
GOD IS IN WITNESS ... WE DO NOT REMAIN SILENT PLUS
IQ4C has posted the plan of the demonstration in Baghdad in this image:
CA55FA96-2E51-417E-A627-FC28F1779999.jpg
and then relayed on twitter:
tired of trying to eat today was a good training to express my freedom in peace, I am a peaceful man, besides being a civilian iraq # # # feb25 iq4c
Sunshine provides coverage of Mosul, where his cousin was involved in the event. She relays some stunning images and named the event:
Today is "Friday of Wrath" and this revolution is called: Al Nakheel's revolution "revolution of the palms."
she writes
The important thing is that for people not to break everything ...
Another thing that is nice to see is people doing all the "Friday prayers "Al Tahreer in Baghdad, Sunnis and Shiites together, and they launched" We are Sunni and Shiite brothers and we do not sell out this country, "the same thing is going to Sulaymania when Kurds and Arabs prayed together ... citizens are united, the government is trying to separate us and extend the confessional, but it will not happen, and plans, as sneaky as they are, will not succeed ..
I pray for a hopeful future, and today I am proud of the Iraqis I know how people are great here, and how they endured, not only for 7 years, but since Saddam took control of the country ...
Warnings in power
The Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, accusing supporters of Saddam and al-Qaida have organized demonstrations and Shiite religious leaders have urged people not to not manifest. Healing Iraq gives (here and here), the bridge of view:
intimidation tactics Maliki no longer work with the Iraqis and only serve to discredit a little more. Iraqis are tired of cronyism, corruption ...
Typical reaction from the clerical establishment that wants to maintain its grip on the Iraqi Shia in order to keep its coffers full. These anti-corruption protests that swept the country in Sulaimaniya Barash are a huge threat to those who hamper progress in the 'democratic Iraq'.
Hawazin Abbas added:
Conduct adopted [by the Iraqi government] in the approach to these events was EXACTLY the same as all tyrannies around: confirmation anxious to deep uncertainty about his own legitimacy, the race promises to train delays, questioning the merits of the dispute and the attempts to appeal to the old bogeymen ... Now, I am FIRMLY against this government
Kassakhoon think these events are just the beginning:
Protests also show how this government is weak and terrified by the population when it sends security forces by the thousands to block roads, mainly bridge leading to the already heavily fortified Green Zone protected by high concrete walls, anti-explosion.
No government officials dared to appear before the demonstrators, they only spoke to state television ..
It is true that the events of today are over the field, but they are still alive inside the demonstrators. What we witnessed today was a little snowball that just started to roll and that will grow every day.
Unlike Mr. Maliki, who accused the protesters of being in the pay of Saddam, Layla Anwar path, among the Iraqi bloggers, is the closest a Saddamism gives a rather different view on events:
PROTESTS 'my ass. Where were you when the tanks arrived? Where were you when the Shiite sectarian and turbaned mullahs you have purchased a few hundred dollars for a finger dipped in purple ink and vote "Democratic" ...
Where were you when we have fled en masse, living the lives of dogs in exile ... Where were you when you wore the militias have emerged naked and danced for you and that we have all been decimated? Where were you, anyway?
Where were you when you left another son of a bitch sectarian Iran again take power, for a second term and you sat with them and talked about national reconciliation and urns?!
Where were you when the Iraqi resistance fighting against the invader ALONE?
... ...
demand better living conditions for the puppets is a nonsense. Hundreds of foreign companies live on your back, bringing with them their own staff by giving yourself to your fate, the so-called educated class of work, blue collar workers in your own country ...
So, where were Do you? ... ...
Drop me a bit, you hypocrites.
Iraq is my greatest love and you are my biggest disappointment.
Speak as much as you want, I do not lend my voice. I was a lone voice for the last 5 years and have suffered the worst abuse in your name. Protest all you want.
Creative Commons License Written by Salam Adil
· Translated by Jean Saint-Dizier
Translation published February 27, 2011 · Printer Print
redditreddit
* * * StumbleUponStumbleUpon
deliciousdelicious
* InstapaperInstapaper
Other tickets on Iraq
*
Read
Iraqis clamoring for change
*
Read
Iraq: A hello to the people of Egypt *
Arab World: Lamentations on the failure of Sudan
read more »
Delete this comment
Comment Please ... Login »
Name (Required) Contact
(will not be published on the site) (Required) Website
Receive e-mail future comments on this post
Rules Comment moderation
* All comments are moderated. Do not send more than once your comment. It could be mistaken for spam by our anti-virus.
* Treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks against individuals will not be approved.
http://fr.globalvoicesonline.org/2011/02/27/59135/
Digital Microscope Eyepiecedriver
YouTube - George Carlin ~ The American Dream
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q&feature=related
Nissan Concept Vs Infiniti Concept
You interviewed Isabelle Saporta, author of "Black Book of Agriculture - 20minutes.fr
http://www.20minutes.fr/article/673951/chat-vous-interviewe-isabelle-saporta-auteur-livre-noir-agriculture
So begins Salon de l'Agriculture in Paris, Isabelle Saporta has answered all your questions about intensive farming and its derivatives ...
Hello, I saw the show on France 3, a show with lots of technical info. Really well done and thank you for the information. But, precisely, what can we do, we consumers, who are not telling everything? We do not have enough information about the products on sale.
Pierrel
should, as much as possible away from processed products back to simple things, fruits and vegetables in season, if possible, purchased from small producers with whom you have a renewed trust. Recover the key word here is TRUST.
Hello, First of all, congratulations for your inquiry and the documentary that is coming. My questions: 1) What to do to get things moving in the right direction? 2) For those who can not, for economic reasons, eat only organic food, how to know the products, channels the "least bad"? Thank you. Jean
already eat local, buy from small producers, and respect the seasons. That alone is already huge.
Thanks for your fight, which I think is noble. I share many of your ideas. By cons you think that one day the things will change? Do you think there is hope for change? This change is caused by a change (see a revolution) of our consumption habits, do you think everyone will be able to change? Fabien
course! But we need a holy nudge policy! We can not do everything based on the consumer. They already pay a lot the consumer: aid, water bills, the health bill ... And he was ready, he, to put all that money in a virtuous agriculture, but for now, it's not that it is oriented toward public policy.
I saw your documentary very interesting. The most astonishing is to learn that it is primarily the grain storage silos which leads to pollution by fungicides and other potentially hazardous substances. Now tell us the name of the only retail brand that uses wheat stored in refrigerated silos to avoid this in the bread making it distributes to consumers. Another question: what do you think of organic products imported from Germany found on our shelves, and their carbon footprint? How is it that we hear more about the aftermath of the recent scandal of their organic food o livestock polluted by dioxins recycled industrial oils supposedly by mistake?
Francoyv
He would agree to pay 15 euros per tonne of wheat so that there are more pesticides storage ... That's what costs the refrigerated silos that can not be processed. Why do not we do massive? Moreover, it is obvious that as long as we feed our animals with all the waste of global industries, there will be health scandals. This year dioxin, some time ago, cadmium ... And this is unfortunately not finished.
Do not you think that the "system" farm in force shall, in its immobility agricultural unions, FNSEA in mind, and its over-representation in politics, susceptible to lobbyists' chemical plant Pharmaceutical?
environmental problems in particular. The example of water pollution is significant. Known for decades, there has never been treated differently by the statements without effect.
I'm puzzled convinced, too. It would take a deep reform of current trade union landscape. FNSEA pushed farmers in this productivist system. A system that makes them lose money, lose their health, undermines our own and ruin our environment. We must the Department of Agriculture emancipated from FNSEA. That slap his fist on the table. Imagine that the State Council in its latest report shows that agriculture is responsible for 60-80% of water pollution and pays 1% of the cleanup bill ...
has been shown that sustainable agriculture can produce as much as earning more and working less. Why the resistance of farmers polluters and poisoners?
Pat29
Ca, I wonder too ... I will not go up as you treat farmers poisoners, but cons, you're right, it is urgentissime changing software. But having struggled with the FNSEA lot these days ... Well, not won.
60 years and I am the son of small family farmers. It too easy to scapegoat. Everyone is responsible to start with the consumer who wanted and still wants the great wholesale and cheap. My parents were practicing agriculture that looks like bio today, but consumers did not want a job with a fruit or a bite of apple scab. To continue to live it took my parents to adapt the application and use pesticides, fertilizers and irrigation. Farmers had problems to solve, they used the products for sale on the market. When the detergent used by the housewife that contained polyphosphate and small eutrophic lakes watercourse was it pointed to the latter, no manufacturers have been asked to change their additives and water treatment plant must die-phosphate. Why does it the same approach with farmers? Give them other products and they will use them. Daniel
That's why I write that the peasants are the scapegoats of a system they sustain. We carry a collective responsibility regarding the current situation. It together and we will survive. Farmers have bent to specifications that pouvouirs public, retail, industrial, have imposed. Consumers are accustomed to flawless products have banned their ugly fruit baskets. All this is true. And that's also why no consumer education and without a strong political will, we will not get away. It is too easy to blame the farmers and let them alone.
The consumer is willing to pay more for organic fruits and vegetables, but what guarantees that the product is actually sold without pesticides and other treatments? Anarchist
ruling
You see where we are? This loss of confidence? There is an urgent need to reconnect with our farmers ...
How do you "educate" the French consumer who has not fear of contradiction by claiming both: good-goods market, so from the global food industry (eg chicken farm)-healthy products for their health that would normally be derived from organic farmer with his neighbor organized AMAP or not but unfortunately most of them are from foreign distribution channels organized on a long-standing industrial base (eg Chinese cabbages imported from Germany)?
Francoyv
The low prices are unrealistic! When consumers turn to the first prize, they forget that in doing so, they pay 4 times what they eat. Once with agricultural subsidies, a second time when slip their products in their cart, a third time when they pay the bill for clean water, and a fourth time when they regulate the slate of public health. If the government put more money in agriculture virtuous, consumers would not have to pay all these bills schedules ... But this would require political will.
And why not laws, but also financial support to stop this massacre? Is there anything to lose? Mythical
You're right, without a courageous intervention of government, we will not get away. Aid must be balanced, give most farmers the most virtuous. But for now, it's not about what we are heading. The latest Finance Act has granted 196 million euros to biofuels while reducing by two the aid of the Bio. Of the 12 billion that farmers receive less than 500 million are spent on environmental measures. It is not heavy ...
Hello, in your book you describe particularly the excesses of the pig. Is it worse than in other livestock (cattle, poultry, etc.).? If so, is that it does not affect other sectors less intensive? You also put in the value chain "White Blue Heart" for cattle feed, is there no other ways much simpler (feeding cows on grass, without needing to add flax) to balance our diet? Thank you.
Babiroussa
As I recalled in my introduction, I mentioned the pig, as I could talk about anything other intensive livestock operations. The example is interesting because pork is the meat we consume the most and they ingest half of veterinary antibiotics in France. The linen industry is a solution, the grass, as I say, too, is an even simpler for cows. Suffice to say that many solutions are available us to get out!
Hello, your struggle is a major challenge for the Company to become our children, grandchildren etc ... .. but do you think that companies like Monsanto, Pioneer and others, will you let them trample flower beds? Do you fear not having serious trouble with this occupation (large grain) who think only gain more money, more money without caring the least, the health of their citizens ? I watched a documentary on Monsanto, and what I discovered ais scared me, because these companies are capable of "ALL" to preserve their gains and even more.
LUMPcefini
are violent attacks and the fight is rough and uneven, you're right. But that's not why I'm impressed. Many farmers told me about the omerta of the environment, their fear, their fear. It is time to break this code of silence. If
distribution (hypermarkets, wholesalers and retail-wholesale, transport and various pharmacies) ceased to abuse our portfolio, our producers could perhaps expect to live decently, to the extent of their efforts, instead to indulge body and soul to the dictatorship stakhanovienne distributors-traders. They produce less, perhaps, better, and certainly for the same price. No?
Old Dear Old crouton crouton
, we are two old croutons ... I fully agree with your analysis. Let me give you a simple example. Today, our animals are fed a corn-soy diet that not only is detestable to the environment, but also generates a generalized deficiency in omega 3 for our milk, our meat, our eggs. And therefore for all of us who consume them. This deficit causes many diseases and causes obesity. However, it would grow flax on only 1% of agricultural land to end this imbalance. 1% that would cost 1 cent more per carcass meat. Who refuses to pay your opinion?
In your book you wonder why we should continue to be financed from public funds a costly for farmers, for our health and our environment and do not invest heavily in the conversation to a more sustainable agriculture respectful of people and the planet. Do you think the French administration, the department and institutes such as INRA can make this transition? The weight of the administration is not it too heavy? And is it that our European Union membership will help us? Gael
INRA is now working hard on these issues and offers many solutions. This institute is considering another way to cultivate that would allow farmers to earn a better living and respect the environment without lowering yields. At European level, the new Commissioner, Ciolos is very sensitive to all these questions. It is particularly concerned that the proteins are more heavily imported but grown in Europe. He hoped that our agriculture is more related to the soil. So we have a window of opportunity to reform the Common Agricultural Policy. It is also necessary that our Minister of Agriculture emancipated from the influence of the majority union, the FNSEA, and it revives the sense peasant ... A world
without pesticides, it is possible? Crops can they survive without pesticides? The model of intensive agriculture it is not based on them?
Bertrand
Yes! And that's great news! And it's not me saying it but the INRA (Institut National de Recherche Agronomique). They proved that by funding up to 200 euros per hectare of organic farming, and 40% by taxing pesticides, it reached 20% of surface organic advocated by the Grenelle environment while reducing by 40% phyto ... It's worth a try, right? But to do this, it will put money into agricultural research rather in the search for new pesticides and most importantly, it will learn the gestures of Agronomy: crop rotation, the importance of plant protein crops that capture nitrogen from the air and exhaust into the ground! In short, learn the art of beautiful peasant.
Hello. I have not yet been able to read your book but you seem to pull red ball on the French model of agriculture. I am familiar with the agricultural world to be employed as a seasonal (to pay for my studies). It is a complex business and drive that is not controlled by visiting a few farms here and there ... Remember that even when the current system has been place after the Second World War, at a time when wheat yields leveled to 10 quintals hectares, or you do not eat their fill (the bread was rationed at the time). The contribution of fertilizer and other plant products, and genetics has enabled today we lack nothing. What model do you think is the best (all organic, farming ...)? Dunga Dunga
Dear, I have not visited "a few farms here and there" but made two-year investigation in this setting by going on the field, staying there for months and meeting (very) many stakeholders. When you read my book, you'll see that I recall that the current productivist system was established after the Second World War to meet the food shortage. We're here today, we (rich countries) to produce better power-wasting. 50% of that produced by rich countries directly involved in the trash. At the same time, the system we have implemented pauperizes countries in developing as we ask them to abandon their crops to produce food to feed our cattle ... In doing so, we expose our farmers to fluctuations in global markets. You are aware that our farmers through a crisis very hard today, they earn more than their lives, they are in disarray and they become sick of the pesticides they apply nutrients. This system is costing us 57 billion euros in subsidies at the European level, what must be added the cost of cleaning up our environment and public health bill: explosion of environmental cancer and anti Bioshield. So yes, I think it's urgent to return to a little more reason.
------------------------------------------------ --------------- Eat
can affect our health? This is the title of a documentary aired Wednesday, February 16 France 3 and directed by Isabelle Saporta, journalist, who publishes this month "The Black Book of Agriculture. As they kill our farmers, our health and the environment "(Fayard). For two years she has traveled the French countryside and demonstrated the absurdity of the system of intensive agriculture.
Eat an apple, a priori healthy eating habit, becomes much less reassuring when we learn that the producers sprinkle of 26 treatments before harvesting and found five different pesticide residues when analyzed. With some 76,000 tons of pesticides used per year, France is the largest user in Europe. And half of all antibiotics in France would be consumed by pigs. Already
author of "Let's not mince our ills. Otherwise consume for better living "(Robert Laffont) on junk food, Isabelle Saporta has long prepared the emissions of Jean-Pierre Coffe" It does not food, it is eaten "on France Inter.
She was the guest editorial. She answered your questions on French agriculture, the drift of intensive production system and your diet above.
MB with AC
http://www.20minutes.fr/article/673951/chat-vous-interviewe-isabelle-saporta-auteur-livre-noir-agriculture
So begins Salon de l'Agriculture in Paris, Isabelle Saporta has answered all your questions about intensive farming and its derivatives ...
Hello, I saw the show on France 3, a show with lots of technical info. Really well done and thank you for the information. But, precisely, what can we do, we consumers, who are not telling everything? We do not have enough information about the products on sale.
Pierrel
should, as much as possible away from processed products back to simple things, fruits and vegetables in season, if possible, purchased from small producers with whom you have a renewed trust. Recover the key word here is TRUST.
Hello, First of all, congratulations for your inquiry and the documentary that is coming. My questions: 1) What to do to get things moving in the right direction? 2) For those who can not, for economic reasons, eat only organic food, how to know the products, channels the "least bad"? Thank you. Jean
already eat local, buy from small producers, and respect the seasons. That alone is already huge.
Thanks for your fight, which I think is noble. I share many of your ideas. By cons you think that one day the things will change? Do you think there is hope for change? This change is caused by a change (see a revolution) of our consumption habits, do you think everyone will be able to change? Fabien
course! But we need a holy nudge policy! We can not do everything based on the consumer. They already pay a lot the consumer: aid, water bills, the health bill ... And he was ready, he, to put all that money in a virtuous agriculture, but for now, it's not that it is oriented toward public policy.
I saw your documentary very interesting. The most astonishing is to learn that it is primarily the grain storage silos which leads to pollution by fungicides and other potentially hazardous substances. Now tell us the name of the only retail brand that uses wheat stored in refrigerated silos to avoid this in the bread making it distributes to consumers. Another question: what do you think of organic products imported from Germany found on our shelves, and their carbon footprint? How is it that we hear more about the aftermath of the recent scandal of their organic food o livestock polluted by dioxins recycled industrial oils supposedly by mistake?
Francoyv
He would agree to pay 15 euros per tonne of wheat so that there are more pesticides storage ... That's what costs the refrigerated silos that can not be processed. Why do not we do massive? Moreover, it is obvious that as long as we feed our animals with all the waste of global industries, there will be health scandals. This year dioxin, some time ago, cadmium ... And this is unfortunately not finished.
Do not you think that the "system" farm in force shall, in its immobility agricultural unions, FNSEA in mind, and its over-representation in politics, susceptible to lobbyists' chemical plant Pharmaceutical?
environmental problems in particular. The example of water pollution is significant. Known for decades, there has never been treated differently by the statements without effect.
I'm puzzled convinced, too. It would take a deep reform of current trade union landscape. FNSEA pushed farmers in this productivist system. A system that makes them lose money, lose their health, undermines our own and ruin our environment. We must the Department of Agriculture emancipated from FNSEA. That slap his fist on the table. Imagine that the State Council in its latest report shows that agriculture is responsible for 60-80% of water pollution and pays 1% of the cleanup bill ...
has been shown that sustainable agriculture can produce as much as earning more and working less. Why the resistance of farmers polluters and poisoners?
Pat29
Ca, I wonder too ... I will not go up as you treat farmers poisoners, but cons, you're right, it is urgentissime changing software. But having struggled with the FNSEA lot these days ... Well, not won.
60 years and I am the son of small family farmers. It too easy to scapegoat. Everyone is responsible to start with the consumer who wanted and still wants the great wholesale and cheap. My parents were practicing agriculture that looks like bio today, but consumers did not want a job with a fruit or a bite of apple scab. To continue to live it took my parents to adapt the application and use pesticides, fertilizers and irrigation. Farmers had problems to solve, they used the products for sale on the market. When the detergent used by the housewife that contained polyphosphate and small eutrophic lakes watercourse was it pointed to the latter, no manufacturers have been asked to change their additives and water treatment plant must die-phosphate. Why does it the same approach with farmers? Give them other products and they will use them. Daniel
That's why I write that the peasants are the scapegoats of a system they sustain. We carry a collective responsibility regarding the current situation. It together and we will survive. Farmers have bent to specifications that pouvouirs public, retail, industrial, have imposed. Consumers are accustomed to flawless products have banned their ugly fruit baskets. All this is true. And that's also why no consumer education and without a strong political will, we will not get away. It is too easy to blame the farmers and let them alone.
The consumer is willing to pay more for organic fruits and vegetables, but what guarantees that the product is actually sold without pesticides and other treatments? Anarchist
ruling
You see where we are? This loss of confidence? There is an urgent need to reconnect with our farmers ...
How do you "educate" the French consumer who has not fear of contradiction by claiming both: good-goods market, so from the global food industry (eg chicken farm)-healthy products for their health that would normally be derived from organic farmer with his neighbor organized AMAP or not but unfortunately most of them are from foreign distribution channels organized on a long-standing industrial base (eg Chinese cabbages imported from Germany)?
Francoyv
The low prices are unrealistic! When consumers turn to the first prize, they forget that in doing so, they pay 4 times what they eat. Once with agricultural subsidies, a second time when slip their products in their cart, a third time when they pay the bill for clean water, and a fourth time when they regulate the slate of public health. If the government put more money in agriculture virtuous, consumers would not have to pay all these bills schedules ... But this would require political will.
And why not laws, but also financial support to stop this massacre? Is there anything to lose? Mythical
You're right, without a courageous intervention of government, we will not get away. Aid must be balanced, give most farmers the most virtuous. But for now, it's not about what we are heading. The latest Finance Act has granted 196 million euros to biofuels while reducing by two the aid of the Bio. Of the 12 billion that farmers receive less than 500 million are spent on environmental measures. It is not heavy ...
Hello, in your book you describe particularly the excesses of the pig. Is it worse than in other livestock (cattle, poultry, etc.).? If so, is that it does not affect other sectors less intensive? You also put in the value chain "White Blue Heart" for cattle feed, is there no other ways much simpler (feeding cows on grass, without needing to add flax) to balance our diet? Thank you.
Babiroussa
As I recalled in my introduction, I mentioned the pig, as I could talk about anything other intensive livestock operations. The example is interesting because pork is the meat we consume the most and they ingest half of veterinary antibiotics in France. The linen industry is a solution, the grass, as I say, too, is an even simpler for cows. Suffice to say that many solutions are available us to get out!
Hello, your struggle is a major challenge for the Company to become our children, grandchildren etc ... .. but do you think that companies like Monsanto, Pioneer and others, will you let them trample flower beds? Do you fear not having serious trouble with this occupation (large grain) who think only gain more money, more money without caring the least, the health of their citizens ? I watched a documentary on Monsanto, and what I discovered ais scared me, because these companies are capable of "ALL" to preserve their gains and even more.
LUMPcefini
are violent attacks and the fight is rough and uneven, you're right. But that's not why I'm impressed. Many farmers told me about the omerta of the environment, their fear, their fear. It is time to break this code of silence. If
distribution (hypermarkets, wholesalers and retail-wholesale, transport and various pharmacies) ceased to abuse our portfolio, our producers could perhaps expect to live decently, to the extent of their efforts, instead to indulge body and soul to the dictatorship stakhanovienne distributors-traders. They produce less, perhaps, better, and certainly for the same price. No?
Old Dear Old crouton crouton
, we are two old croutons ... I fully agree with your analysis. Let me give you a simple example. Today, our animals are fed a corn-soy diet that not only is detestable to the environment, but also generates a generalized deficiency in omega 3 for our milk, our meat, our eggs. And therefore for all of us who consume them. This deficit causes many diseases and causes obesity. However, it would grow flax on only 1% of agricultural land to end this imbalance. 1% that would cost 1 cent more per carcass meat. Who refuses to pay your opinion?
In your book you wonder why we should continue to be financed from public funds a costly for farmers, for our health and our environment and do not invest heavily in the conversation to a more sustainable agriculture respectful of people and the planet. Do you think the French administration, the department and institutes such as INRA can make this transition? The weight of the administration is not it too heavy? And is it that our European Union membership will help us? Gael
INRA is now working hard on these issues and offers many solutions. This institute is considering another way to cultivate that would allow farmers to earn a better living and respect the environment without lowering yields. At European level, the new Commissioner, Ciolos is very sensitive to all these questions. It is particularly concerned that the proteins are more heavily imported but grown in Europe. He hoped that our agriculture is more related to the soil. So we have a window of opportunity to reform the Common Agricultural Policy. It is also necessary that our Minister of Agriculture emancipated from the influence of the majority union, the FNSEA, and it revives the sense peasant ... A world
without pesticides, it is possible? Crops can they survive without pesticides? The model of intensive agriculture it is not based on them?
Bertrand
Yes! And that's great news! And it's not me saying it but the INRA (Institut National de Recherche Agronomique). They proved that by funding up to 200 euros per hectare of organic farming, and 40% by taxing pesticides, it reached 20% of surface organic advocated by the Grenelle environment while reducing by 40% phyto ... It's worth a try, right? But to do this, it will put money into agricultural research rather in the search for new pesticides and most importantly, it will learn the gestures of Agronomy: crop rotation, the importance of plant protein crops that capture nitrogen from the air and exhaust into the ground! In short, learn the art of beautiful peasant.
Hello. I have not yet been able to read your book but you seem to pull red ball on the French model of agriculture. I am familiar with the agricultural world to be employed as a seasonal (to pay for my studies). It is a complex business and drive that is not controlled by visiting a few farms here and there ... Remember that even when the current system has been place after the Second World War, at a time when wheat yields leveled to 10 quintals hectares, or you do not eat their fill (the bread was rationed at the time). The contribution of fertilizer and other plant products, and genetics has enabled today we lack nothing. What model do you think is the best (all organic, farming ...)? Dunga Dunga
Dear, I have not visited "a few farms here and there" but made two-year investigation in this setting by going on the field, staying there for months and meeting (very) many stakeholders. When you read my book, you'll see that I recall that the current productivist system was established after the Second World War to meet the food shortage. We're here today, we (rich countries) to produce better power-wasting. 50% of that produced by rich countries directly involved in the trash. At the same time, the system we have implemented pauperizes countries in developing as we ask them to abandon their crops to produce food to feed our cattle ... In doing so, we expose our farmers to fluctuations in global markets. You are aware that our farmers through a crisis very hard today, they earn more than their lives, they are in disarray and they become sick of the pesticides they apply nutrients. This system is costing us 57 billion euros in subsidies at the European level, what must be added the cost of cleaning up our environment and public health bill: explosion of environmental cancer and anti Bioshield. So yes, I think it's urgent to return to a little more reason.
------------------------------------------------ --------------- Eat
can affect our health? This is the title of a documentary aired Wednesday, February 16 France 3 and directed by Isabelle Saporta, journalist, who publishes this month "The Black Book of Agriculture. As they kill our farmers, our health and the environment "(Fayard). For two years she has traveled the French countryside and demonstrated the absurdity of the system of intensive agriculture.
Eat an apple, a priori healthy eating habit, becomes much less reassuring when we learn that the producers sprinkle of 26 treatments before harvesting and found five different pesticide residues when analyzed. With some 76,000 tons of pesticides used per year, France is the largest user in Europe. And half of all antibiotics in France would be consumed by pigs. Already
author of "Let's not mince our ills. Otherwise consume for better living "(Robert Laffont) on junk food, Isabelle Saporta has long prepared the emissions of Jean-Pierre Coffe" It does not food, it is eaten "on France Inter.
She was the guest editorial. She answered your questions on French agriculture, the drift of intensive production system and your diet above.
MB with AC
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)